Model Rocket Stability & Fin Sizing Calculator
Enter the nose, body, fin, and measured launch-ready CG dimensions to estimate center of pressure and static margin. The calculator also works backward to suggest a fin span or nose ballast for a target margin.
Static stability margin1.25
- Center of pressure from nose tip (mm)
- 341.95
- CG-to-CP distance (mm)
- 51.95
- Stability assessment
- Common design range: the margin is between one and two calibers.
- Minimum fin span for target margin (mm)
- 72.91
- Additional nose ballast for target margin (g)
- 12.56
- CG after suggested ballast (mm)
- 279.55
All length outputs are in mm.
Fin sizing holds root chord, tip chord, sweep, and fin position fixed and searches up to 20 body diameters.
How to use this calculator
- Choose millimeters or inches, then use that same length unit for every dimension.
- Enter the nose shape, body diameter, fin planform, and fin location from the nose tip.
- Enter the launch-ready CG and mass with the motor, recovery system, and payload installed.
- Set the target stability margin, then compare the calculated margin with the fin-span and ballast suggestions.
How the stability margin is calculated
This calculator uses the simplified Barrowman method for a slender, axisymmetric rocket with three or four conventional trapezoidal fins. It treats the nose and fin set as normal-force contributors, finds each component center of pressure, and combines them with a normal-force-weighted average.
Use one length unit throughout. Let d be body diameter, R = d / 2, Ln be nose length, N be fin count, Cr be root chord, Ct be tip chord, s be span, Xs be leading-edge sweep, Xf0 be the fin root leading-edge position, and Xcg be the loaded center of gravity from the nose tip.
The nose normal-force slope is CNa_n = 2. The nose CP is Xn = k * Ln, where k is 2/3 for a conical nose, 0.466 for a tangent ogive, 1/2 for a parabolic nose, and 1/3 for an elliptical nose.
The fin mid-chord line is lm = sqrt(s^2 + (Xs + (Ct - Cr) / 2)^2). The fin normal-force slope is CNa_f = (1 + R / (R + s)) * (4N(s / d)^2 / (1 + sqrt(1 + (2lm / (Cr + Ct))^2))). The fin CP is Xf = Xf0 + Xs(Cr + 2Ct) / (3(Cr + Ct)) + (Cr + Ct - CrCt / (Cr + Ct)) / 6.
The total center of pressure is Xcp = (CNa_n * Xn + CNa_f * Xf) / (CNa_n + CNa_f). The static stability margin is SM = (Xcp - Xcg) / d, expressed in calibers. A margin at or below zero is unstable, below one caliber is marginal, one to two calibers is a common design range, and a much larger value can make the rocket turn into the wind more strongly.
What moves the result most
Moving the loaded CG forward increases the margin. Larger fin span generally increases the fin normal force and pulls the combined CP aft toward the fin CP. Moving the fin set aft also helps. Nose shape matters, but the fin position and launch-ready balance usually dominate the practical decision.
Reverse fin sizing and ballast
For fin sizing, the calculator varies only s and uses bisection to find the smallest span that makes (Xcp - Xcg) / d meet the target. Root chord, tip chord, sweep, fin count, and fin location stay fixed. If the fin CP is not far enough aft, or the needed span is beyond the search bound, the result reports no span solution.
For ballast, the target CG is Xtarget = Xcp - T * d. The required mass is mb = M(Xcg - Xtarget) / (Xtarget - Xb), clamped to zero when the current CG already meets the target. Positive ballast only works when the ballast location is forward of the target CG.
What this calculator leaves out
The estimate omits body lift corrections, boattails, transitions, canards, tube fins, ring fins, fin thickness, fin flexibility, launch lugs, motor thrust alignment, wind, and dynamic stability. It is a small-angle static estimate, not a six-degree-of-freedom flight simulation.
Worked example
For the default rocket, the tangent-ogive nose is 100 mm long and the body diameter is 41.6 mm. Three fins have a 100 mm root chord, 50 mm tip chord, 60 mm span, 35 mm sweep, and root leading edge 350 mm from the nose tip. With the loaded CG at 290 mm, the Barrowman calculation gives a CP at about 341.95 mm.
The CG-to-CP distance is about 51.95 mm, so the static margin is 51.95 / 41.6 = 1.25 calibers. To reach a target of 1.5 calibers by fin span alone, the same planform needs about 72.91 mm of span. Nose ballast at 30 mm from the tip would need about 12.56 g, moving the CG to about 279.55 mm.
Common questions
How many calibers of stability should a model rocket have?
Many conventional subsonic model rockets are designed around one to two calibers of static stability at launch. Less than one caliber can be marginal, while much more than two calibers can make the rocket respond strongly to wind.
Should CG be measured with the motor installed?
Yes. Measure the CG in launch-ready condition with the motor, recovery system, and payload installed. Motor mass and payload position can move the CG enough to change the stability margin.
What is the difference between center of gravity and center of pressure?
The center of gravity is the balance point of the rocket mass. The center of pressure is the effective point where aerodynamic side forces act when the rocket is at a small angle of attack. Static stability requires the CP to be behind the CG.
How do larger fins move the center of pressure?
Larger fin span increases the fin normal-force contribution. Because the fin CP is usually near the aft end of the rocket, that added contribution pulls the combined CP aft and increases the static margin.
How much nose weight should I add to make a rocket stable?
This calculator solves the two-mass CG equation for ballast at the position you enter. The answer is zero if the current CG already meets the target, and it is not achievable if the proposed ballast is not forward of the target CG.
Why can OpenRocket produce a different CP or stability margin?
OpenRocket can model more geometry and flight effects than this simplified Barrowman implementation. Differences are expected when the rocket has transitions, boattails, nonstandard fins, launch lugs, rail buttons, clustered bodies, or conditions outside low-speed small-angle assumptions.